The Purdue OWL website is a credible source in assisting you in understanding and improving your writing. I feel this webpage should act as a huge role in your writing whether you need to write a ten-page research paper or a simple five-paragraph essay for your history class. It clearly states what your thesis should look like, what is too broad or what is too narrow. Warrants, claims, and rebuttals are all factors to support your thesis.
So should Gallaudet University follow this website? Yes. Not just Gallaudet University but every other university there are in this world. It should be the unwritten rubric for every single piece of writing. This website should be used as a guide because it inevitably applies to every writing rubric ever made.
The Gallaudet University’s Writing Rubric covers only five aspects of writing; assignment formatting and citing, written English conventions, critical thinking, organization of ideas, and author’s personal tone and audience awareness. Purdue University’s Writing Rubric includes all of those aspects and provides an explicit explanation for each one. Whereas the Gallaudet University’s Writing Rubric looks weaker in comparison: there is no mention of warrants, evidence, or rebuttals. They are crucially critical when it comes to writing.
In my experience, I always have had a difficult time writing mainly because I never know if my thesis is good enough or if my arguments are strong enough to support my claim. I was never taught to use a counterclaim or rebuttals to make my thesis stronger. After reading this website, I feel more confident in my writing as I will continue to use the Purdue University’s Writing Rubric, as well as Gallaudet University’s Writing Rubric.
Another aspect of the Purdue University’s Writing Rubric that I liked was that it included logos, ethos, and pathos (as mentioned in the Lunsford book). I feel it is extremely critical to have those three factors incorporated in every piece of writing. In the Purdue University’s Writing Rubric is the perfect combination of Gallaudet University’s Writing Rubric and Chapters Two to Four in the Lunsford et al. 2007 book. When logos, ethos, and pathos are used, the writing automatically become a stronger piece and it will connect with the readers more intimately. The readers will grasp a better concept with your writing.
Frankly, I am envious of the students at Purdue University because they must be writing their papers with such ease while the students of the rest of the world are struggling. Purdue University deserves to be praised for their Writing Rubic because it is transparent that a lot of thought and time were dedicated in making this perfect rubric.

yes luckily for purdue university students because they are using the OWL all the time because they are living on OWL's headquarters. BUT us, gallaudet students can be like them if we use OWL a lot more!
ReplyDeleteI agree the students at prude university sure is lucky. :)
ReplyDeleteI like how you said that OWL is a credible source of writing assistance. That is true since it is from an university.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everyone here, the students at Purdue University are lucky to have such reliable sources such as the OWL, but if you think about it. We are fortunate as well because we have access to these things now. Gallaudet University has a chance at improving our writing skills, and we will IF WE ALLOW IT! Come on everyone, start using OWL and be the change you want to see!
ReplyDeleteI think everyone has that same problem when they write their thesis. Good thing we have the OWL website to help us =]
ReplyDeleteyes i agree. Purdue is lucky. I was never good at writing too.
ReplyDeleteAll of us, let's move to Purdue University tomorrow! Where is Purdue University?
ReplyDeleteI liked how you connected the Lunsford book in your piece smoothly, it doesnt look out of place. beautiful!
ReplyDeleteOH, I didn't realize that our essays are almost similar and we included some same things in our blogs. Well, great minds think alike I guess. Haha
ReplyDeleteWell done, straight to the point and it works.
ReplyDelete